9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of provisions under s. 115J for computation of book profit. 2. Validity of AO's determination of book profits and tax levy under s. 115J. 3. Whether carried forward loss should be reduced from profit without carried forward depreciation under s. 115J. Detailed Analysis: 1. The appeal involved a dispute regarding the computation of book profit under s. 115J for the assessment year 1989-90. The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision, arguing that the computation of book profit was not free from controversy and should be rectifiable under s. 154 of the IT Act. The issue revolved around the interpretation of specific clauses and provisos under s. 115J and the Companies Act, leading to a debate on the clarity of the provisions. 2. The AO had issued a notice under s. 154 to amend the assessment by determining the book profits at a specific figure and levying tax accordingly. The Departmental Representative contended that s. 115J constituted a self-contained code, justifying the AO's actions. However, the assessee argued against the AO's decision, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue, especially concerning the treatment of disallowed amounts under s. 43B in earlier years. The Tribunal deliberated on the applicability of s. 115J and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, considering the issue as beyond the scope of rectification under s. 154. 3. The crux of the matter lay in whether the carried forward loss should be reduced from the profit in the absence of carried forward depreciation under s. 115J. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of s. 205 of the Companies Act, emphasizing the restrictions on dividend declarations based on profits and losses of previous years. The debate centered on the interplay between carried forward losses, depreciation, and dividend declarations, leading to a conclusion that the issue was debatable and fell outside the purview of rectification under s. 154. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision.
|
