Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1996 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1996 (3) TMI 112 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Whether precious stones declared under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, 1975, are considered capital assets for the purpose of capital gain tax under section 2(14)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Analysis:
The case involved a question of law arising from the assessment year 1978-79 regarding the treatment of precious stones disclosed under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, 1975. The assessee had contributed part of the disclosed precious stones towards capital in a firm, and the market value of the stones differed from the book value. The Income-tax Officer initially treated the disclosed amount as income from other sources for the assessment year 1978-79, stating that the disclosures had already been accounted for in the previous year. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax set aside the assessment, directing a re-computation based on certain statements and stock. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal later ruled that there was no transfer of capital assets within the meaning of section 45, and the exclusion under section 2(14)(i) applied, leading to no capital gain tax liability for the assessee.

The Tribunal considered the assessee's history of possessing and trading in precious stones, along with the specific contributions made towards capital in the firm, Jus Gems. It was noted that the disclosed stones were part of the stock-in-trade contributed by the assessee, who was a dealer in precious stones. The Tribunal's decision was influenced by the assessee's genuine intention to contribute the stones as capital, similar to a precedent cited where cut-emeralds were contributed as capital in a firm, resulting in no capital gain tax liability. The exclusion under section 2(14)(i) was crucial in determining that the precious stones were not classified as capital assets for tax purposes, aligning with the decision in the referenced case.

Relying on the precedent and the interpretation of the relevant provisions, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the precious stones disclosed under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, 1975, did not qualify as capital assets under section 2(14)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the reference was answered in favor of the assessee, leading to no capital gain tax liability on the disclosed stones.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates