Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2010 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (1) TMI 1201 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Appeal by Revenue against deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for wrong claim of deduction u/s 80IB of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05.

Summary:
1. The appeals arose from orders of CIT(A) Karnal regarding penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for wrong deduction claim u/s 80IB on export incentives.
2. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction u/s 80IB based on a Supreme Court decision and initiated penalty proceedings.
3. Assessee argued penalty could not be imposed due to differing High Court decisions on deduction u/s 80IB for export incentives.
4. CIT(A) deleted the penalty citing support for the deduction claim from various High Court and ITAT decisions.
5. ITAT Delhi Bench "C" also deleted the penalty, considering the claim as bona fide and debatable due to conflicting High Court opinions.
6. The penalty was not upheld, and the Revenue's appeals for all years were dismissed.

Judgment Details:
- The appeals concerned the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for incorrect deduction claims u/s 80IB on export incentives for Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05.
- The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction based on a Supreme Court decision and initiated penalty proceedings.
- Assessee argued against penalty imposition citing differing High Court decisions on the deduction's allowability.
- CIT(A) deleted the penalty, noting the bona fide nature of the claim and support from various High Court and ITAT decisions.
- ITAT Delhi Bench "C" also upheld the deletion of penalty, considering the claim as debatable due to conflicting High Court opinions.
- The penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposed, and the Revenue's appeals for all years were dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates