9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax Act for deduction in export business profits. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement of a partnership firm to 100% deduction under Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax Act for income earned from export business. The assessing authority initially rejected the claim, providing proportionate deduction based on total turnover and export turnover. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld this decision, emphasizing that deduction should be allowed in proportion to export turnover. However, the Tribunal, following a precedent, ruled in favor of the assessee, granting 100% deduction under Section 80-HHC for export business profits. The revenue, dissatisfied with the Tribunal's decision, sought to challenge it by requesting the Tribunal to refer the question of law to the High Court. The Tribunal initially rejected this request, leading the revenue to file petitions before the High Court. Eventually, the High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question for consideration. The main contention raised by the revenue was that the Tribunal erred in allowing the deduction solely based on separate books of accounts maintained by the assessee, contrary to the legislative intent of Section 80-HHC(3)(b). The High Court analyzed the circular issued by the Board, clarifying the computation of deduction under Section 80-HHC(3)(b). The circular emphasized that the deduction should be based on the entire profit of the business, apportioned according to export turnover relative to total turnover. It highlighted that the legislative mandate was to compute the profit of the entire business, not segregating export profits. The Court noted that the Tribunal's reliance on separate books of accounts was misplaced, as profits should be computed as per the Income Tax Rules, not based on accounting practices. Referring to precedents from the Kerala and Madras High Courts, the High Court emphasized the importance of correctly interpreting Section 80-HHC(3)(a) and (b). The Madras High Court's decision, which focused on separate accounts maintained by the assessee, was deemed incorrect in light of the specific provisions of the Act. Ultimately, the High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to 100% deduction under Section 80-HHC for export business profits.
|
