Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (5) TMI 1011 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Determination of whether profit earned in transactions in shares should be assessed as business income or as capital gains.

Summary:
The appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of transactions in shares treated as business profits. The main issue revolved around the classification of profit earned in transactions in shares as business income or capital gains.

During the assessment proceedings, it was found that the assessee was actively involved in the sale and purchase of shares, conducting numerous transactions on a daily basis. The AO observed that the assessee held shares for a short period, with the majority being held for less than 45 days. The AO concluded that the assessee was engaged in profit speculation through share transactions and treated the sum as business income.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) allowed the claim of the assessee, emphasizing that the activity of buying and selling shares was more in the nature of investment rather than trading. The CIT(A) directed the AO to treat the income from the transactions as capital gains instead of business income.

The Tribunal considered the principles outlined in a previous decision and highlighted factors such as the intention of the assessee at the time of purchase, frequency of transactions, holding period, and accounting treatment of shares. The Tribunal concluded that a clear distinction between trading and investment activities needed to be established based on specific criteria.

As the AO did not collect essential data to determine the frequency of transactions and holding periods, the matter was remanded back to the AO. The AO was directed to allow the assessee to work out the business income and capital gains based on holding periods, following the decision in the referenced case. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the judgment focused on the critical distinction between trading and investment activities in shares, emphasizing the need for clear criteria to determine the tax treatment of profits earned from such transactions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates