Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2015 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 2515 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice

Detailed Analysis:
The petitioner, a manufacturer/dealer in condiments, masala powder, and chilli powder, filed a Writ Petition seeking to quash an order by the respondent under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The petitioner contended that they had properly reported their turnovers under both the TNVAT Act and the CST Act separately, as required by the rules, and had claimed exemption on their sales turnover of chillies and chilly powder under the TNVAT Act. However, the respondent issued a notice demanding tax payment for exempted sales, without providing a personal hearing to the petitioner, which the petitioner argued was a violation of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner's main contention was that the impugned order was passed without affording them a personal hearing, as mandated by Section 22(4) of the Act. The petitioner argued that the lack of personal hearing amounted to a total violation of principles of natural justice, rendering the impugned order invalid. The respondent, through the Additional Govt. Pleader, opposed this contention, claiming that the order was reasoned and did not require setting aside.

However, the Court, after considering the arguments, held that personal hearing was a mandatory requirement under Section 22(4) of the Act before passing such orders. Since the petitioner was not provided with a personal hearing to substantiate their claim, the Court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner within four weeks. The respondent was further instructed to pass appropriate orders based on merits and in accordance with the law within four weeks from the date of the personal hearing.

In conclusion, the Writ Petition was disposed of with the direction for a personal hearing to be provided, and no costs were awarded. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed as a result of the judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates