9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of business loss claimed on account of write-off of bad debt. Summary: Disallowance of Business Loss Claimed on Account of Write-off of Bad Debt: The appeals filed by the Revenue are against the common order dated 30th November 2009, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-XXXI, Mumbai, for assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The sole issue in these appeals is the addition made on account of disallowance of bad debt. The assessee, engaged in the business of export of garments, claimed business loss of ` 9,97,894 for A.Y. 2005-06 and ` 54,00,000 for A.Y. 2006-07, which were disallowed by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) u/s 36(2) of the Act on the grounds that the assessee is not in the business of money lending, and the advances were capital in nature and not proven irrecoverable. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the claim of the assessee, holding that the loss was directly related to business operations and was genuine. The Revenue, aggrieved by this decision, appealed before the Tribunal. The Tribunal considered the arguments from both sides. The Departmental Representative argued that the loss was capital in nature and not allowable, while the Counsel for the assessee contended that the loss was a revenue loss and directly related to business operations. The Counsel cited various case laws to support the claim that the year of write-off is the year of allowability and that it is not necessary to file a civil suit to prove irrecoverability. The Tribunal upheld the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals), noting that the loss was directly related to business operations and that the advances were made for business purposes. The Tribunal referenced several judgments, including those of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, to support the decision that the loss was allowable as a business loss. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow the business loss claimed by the assessee. Order pronounced in the open Court on 22.7.2011.
|
