Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2014 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (11) TMI 1084 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Barred demand by limitation for denial of Cenvat credit on iron and steel items used as structurals.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, addressed the issue of a demand raised for the period February 2007 to December 2007. The demand was based on the denial of Cenvat credit on duty paid for various iron and steel items alleged to have been used as structurals, making the credit unavailable as per the law established in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. The Tribunal noted that similar issues had been previously decided, holding that since the law was declared subsequently, no malafide intent could be attributed to the appellant for alleging suppression and invoking a longer period of limitation. Reference was made to several decisions by the Tribunal and the Supreme Court, including Continental Foundation Joint Venture v. CCE, Chandigarh-I, Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Chandigarh, and others, to support this stance.

The Tribunal found that since the entire demand was barred by limitation, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the timeline of legal precedents and the absence of malafide intent in cases involving the limitation period for demands related to Cenvat credit on specific items like iron and steel used as structurals.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates