9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the filing of Form No. 6A under section 143(2)(a) automatically cancels the original order under section 143(1). 2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and restoring that of the Income-tax Officer. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Automatic Cancellation of Original Order upon Filing Form No. 6A The court examined whether the legal effect of filing Form No. 6A in terms of section 143(2)(a) was that the original order under section 143(1) was automatically canceled. The assessee argued that filing Form No. 6A should vacate the original assessment order, making it non-existent for rectification under section 155. However, the Tribunal held that filing Form No. 6A does not automatically cancel the assessment under section 143(1). Instead, it only means that the objection raised in Form No. 6A would be considered by the Income-tax Officer, who would then pass the requisite order. The Tribunal emphasized that until such an order is passed, the original order remains valid and enforceable. The court supported this interpretation, clarifying that the second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 143 only prevents the assessee from being deemed a defaulter and from accruing additional interest on the disputed tax amount, but it does not annul the original assessment order. Issue 2: Justification of Tribunal in Setting Aside the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Order The Tribunal's decision to set aside the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order and restore the Income-tax Officer's order was scrutinized. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner had accepted the assessee's plea that the original order under section 143(1) was vacated upon filing Form No. 6A, and thus, there was no subsisting assessment order for rectification under section 155. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that the assessment does not get automatically canceled upon filing Form No. 6A. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court decision in Kapurchand Shrimal [1981] 131 ITR 451, which mandates appellate authorities to set aside orders not in accordance with the law and provide specific directions for proper assessment. The Tribunal concluded that the original assessment remains valid until the objection raised in Form No. 6A is duly considered and disposed of by the Income-tax Officer. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order and restored the original assessment order by the Income-tax Officer. Relevant Legal Provisions and Interpretation The court analyzed section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it stood at the relevant time. Section 143(1) allowed the Assessing Officer to assess the total income or loss of the assessee without requiring their presence. Section 143(2) provided that if an assessee objected to the assessment within one month by filing Form No. 6A, the disputed tax amount would not be considered defaulted, and no additional interest would accrue. Section 143(3) allowed the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh assessment order after considering the objections and evidence. The court also examined the limitation period under section 153 of the Act, which prescribed a two-year period from the end of the assessment year for making an assessment order. The court noted that clause (d) of section 153(1), which introduced a six-month limitation period for disposing of objections under section 143(2)(a), was not applicable to the assessment year in question (1980-81), as it came into effect on October 1, 1984. Conclusion The court concluded that the filing of Form No. 6A does not automatically cancel the original assessment order under section 143(1). The original order remains valid until the objection is considered and a fresh order is passed by the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal was justified in setting aside the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order and restoring the Income-tax Officer's order. The court emphasized a harmonious reading of section 143(2) and section 153, protecting the assessee's rights regarding the disputed tax amount while ensuring the original assessment order's validity.
|
