Home
Issues Involved:
- Appeal filed by assessee and Revenue against the order of CIT (A)-XVI, Ahmedabad for Assessment Year 2003-04 and 2006-07. - Common grievance of Revenue in both years regarding deletion of addition made on account of deduction u/s. 80IB. Assessment Year 2003-04 and 2006-07 - Deduction u/s. 80IB: - Assessee engaged in trading of shares, securities, equity mutual funds, and manufacturing & selling soft drink concentrate. - Claimed deduction u/s. 80IB in A.Y. 2003-04. AO found less than 10 workers in manufacturing process, denied deduction. - CIT (A) held assessee employed more than 10 workers, eligible for deduction u/s. 80IB. - AO relied on muster roll sheets showing 6-7 workers, denied deduction. - CIT (A) considered evidence of two units, bottle washing unit workers not in muster roll. - CIT (A) accepted appellant's arguments, allowed deduction u/s. 80IB. - ITAT upheld CIT (A)'s decision, dismissed Revenue's appeal. Disallowance of Salary Expenses: - As assessee was found to employ more than 10 workers, salary expenses were allowed by CIT (A). - ITAT found no infirmity in CIT (A)'s decision, dismissed Revenue's appeal on salary expenses. Cross Appeal - Eligibility for Deduction u/s. 80IB: - CIT (A) denied claim u/s. 80IB due to lack of positive Gross Total Income after setting off losses. - ITAT clarified deduction u/s. 80IB limited to available gross total income, not exceeding it. - Directed matter back to A.O. for re-computing eligible deduction u/s. 80IB. Interest u/s. 234D: - ITAT referred to Delhi High Court decision that section 234D applies from A.Y. 2004-05 onwards. - As A.Y. 2003-04 is under consideration, directed A.O. not to charge interest u/s. 234D. Conclusion: - Revenue's appeals dismissed, assessee's appeal partly allowed. - Order pronounced on 12-08-2011 by ITAT Ahmedabad.
|