Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (5) TMI 1071 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Adjustment of refund claim towards arrear of Govt. dues.

Analysis:
The case involved the adjustment of a refund claim towards arrear dues adjudicated as payable by the appellant in previous instances. The appellant's refund claim of Rs. 30,43,763/- was partially allowed, with Rs. 15,07,902/- adjusted towards pending arrear dues, and the balance refunded. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjustment, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The appellant argued that since a stay application had been complied with, the balance dues from the adjudication order were not payable during the appeal, questioning the adjustment against the refund. The Departmental Representative supported the findings of the impugned order.

Upon hearing both parties and examining the records, the Tribunal noted that the central excise demand and penalty confirmed in the adjudication order had been stayed by the Commissioner (Appeals) upon a pre-deposit condition by the appellant. As the balance amount was stayed pending appeal, the Tribunal found no merit in adjusting the entire amount from the refund claim. Referring to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, the Tribunal highlighted that the Act did not impose any specific restriction on adjusting arrear dues from refund amounts, thereby indicating that such adjustments could not be made by the statutory authority. Additionally, the Tribunal pointed out that Section 11 of the Act, which deals with the recovery of Govt. dues, was not invoked in the adjudication order for adjusting the refund amount towards arrear dues, making such adjustment contrary to statutory provisions.

Consequently, the Tribunal found no merits in the impugned order and allowed the appeal filed by the appellant. The operative portion of the decision was pronounced in open court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates