9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to relief u/s 80J for the seed unit. 2. Entitlement to relief u/s 80J for the cattle feed unit. Summary: Issue 1: Entitlement to relief u/s 80J for the seed unit The primary question was whether the assessee was entitled to relief u/s 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for its seed unit for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1972-73 to 1974-75. The Income-tax Officer initially denied the relief, arguing that the assessee was not manufacturing or producing any article as required u/s 80J(4). However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner granted the relief for the years 1972-73 to 1974-75. The Tribunal upheld this decision, concluding that the assessee was indeed manufacturing or producing an end-product. The Department contended that the assessee was merely processing seeds, which did not amount to manufacturing or producing an end-product. They cited various judgments to support their argument. Conversely, the assessee argued that the processing of seeds involved several stages, transforming raw seeds into marketable seeds for cultivation, thus constituting manufacturing or producing an article. The court referred to the Allahabad High Court's decision in Tarai Development Corporation v. CIT [1979] 120 ITR 342, which held that processed seeds are considered manufactured or produced articles for the purposes of sections 33, 80B, and 80-I. The court agreed with this interpretation, noting that the processing of seeds involved significant changes, making them suitable only for cultivation and not for consumption. Therefore, the court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, holding that the assessee was entitled to relief u/s 80J for the seed unit for the assessment years in question. Issue 2: Entitlement to relief u/s 80J for the cattle feed unit For the assessment years 1972-73 to 1974-75, the question also involved whether the assessee was entitled to relief u/s 80J for its cattle feed unit. The Tribunal had granted this relief, but the court found that there were no recorded facts about the manufacturing or processing activities related to the cattle feed. Without these details, the court could not determine if the assessee was indeed manufacturing or producing cattle feed. The court directed the Tribunal to gather the necessary facts regarding the cattle feed unit's activities and reconsider the assessee's entitlement to relief u/s 80J based on these facts, after providing an opportunity for a hearing. Conclusion: The court answered the questions regarding the seed unit in the affirmative, favoring the assessee, but returned the question regarding the cattle feed unit unanswered, directing the Tribunal to gather more facts and reconsider the issue. Counsel's fee was set at Rs. 1,000.
|
