9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (10) TMI 1006 - AT - Income TaxPenalty u/s 271AAA r.w.s. 274 - requirement to pay the due taxes on the undisclosed income before the due date of filing of return of income - Held that - For the purpose of claiming immunity from penalty there is no requirement of paying taxes on the undisclosed income before the due date of return of income under section 139 (1) of the Act. Further it is not disputed that the assessee had paid taxes on the undisclosed income surrendered in the statement made under section 132(4) of the Act. The manner of earning the income and its substantiation thereof has also been accepted by the Ld. CIT(A) and is not the matter of dispute. The assessee therefore has fulfilled all the conditions required for claiming immunity from the levy of penalty under the provisions of section 271 AAA of the Act. Moreover we find that in the case of other assessees belonging to the same group, the Ld CIT(A) accepted the contentions of the assessee, wherein besides other pleadings made, the assessee relied upon the aforestated apex court decision in the case of Gebilal Kanhaiyalal (2012 (9) TMI 297 - SUPREME COURT) on the impugned issue, and deleted the penalty levied. Further, admittedly ,no appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the said orders of the CIT(A). Thus we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and delete the penalty levied under section 271AAA - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Levy of penalty under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Compliance with conditions for immunity from penalty under section 271AAA. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Levy of Penalty under Section 271AAA: The primary issue in the appeal is the levy of penalty under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case originated from a search and seizure operation conducted at the premises of the Pavitra group on 16/02/2012. The assessee surrendered an undisclosed income of ?1,00,00,000, out of which ?50 Lacs was attributed to jewelry and the remaining ?50 Lacs to house renovations. The Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the surrender but initiated penalty proceedings under section 271AAA, citing that the assessee did not substantiate the manner of earning the undisclosed income. Consequently, a penalty of ?10,00,000 was levied. 2. Compliance with Conditions for Immunity from Penalty under Section 271AAA: The assessee contended that the penalty was not applicable as the undisclosed income was declared, and taxes were paid. The CIT(A) initially upheld the penalty, referencing the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision in Ashok Kumar Gupta vs CIT, which required taxes to be paid before the due date of filing the return for immunity from penalty. However, the Supreme Court in ACIT, Udaipur vs M/s Gebilal Kanhaiyalal HUF clarified that no specific time limit is prescribed for paying taxes on undisclosed income for immunity under clause 2 of Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c). The Supreme Court emphasized that the only requirement is the payment of tax along with interest, without a specified deadline. Judgment Analysis: The tribunal examined the rival contentions and the orders of the lower authorities. It was noted that the CIT(A) relied on a High Court decision that was overruled by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's ruling clarified that for immunity from penalty under section 271AAA, the assessee must pay taxes and interest on the undisclosed income, but there is no requirement to do so before the due date of filing the return. The tribunal found that the assessee had indeed paid the taxes and substantiated the manner of earning the income, fulfilling all conditions for immunity from penalty under section 271AAA. Additionally, it was observed that in similar cases involving other assessees from the same group, the CIT(A) had deleted the penalties, and no appeals were filed by the Revenue against those orders. Conclusion: The tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and deleted the penalty of ?10,00,000 levied under section 271AAA. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, confirming that the conditions for immunity from penalty under section 271AAA were met, and the penalty was not warranted. Order Pronounced: The order was pronounced in the open court, allowing the appeal of the assessee.
|
