9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The issues involved in this case are whether the Tribunal erred in allowing a 40% deduction from the incentive bonus under the head 'Salaries' and whether the incentive bonus falls within the ambit of a specific provision of the Income-tax Act for deduction purposes. Issue 1: Tribunal's Decision on 40% Deduction The assessee, an employee of the Life Insurance Corporation, received an incentive bonus in addition to salary. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the 40% deduction claimed by the assessee, but the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed it, stating that the bonus was received on account of a contractual arrangement. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that similar claims by other assesses were allowed. The High Court emphasized that it cannot interfere with findings of fact unless they are transformed into questions of law. The Tribunal's decision was based on available material, and without additional evidence, the court could not take a different view. Issue 2: Classification of Incentive Bonus The Tribunal held that the incentive bonus received was not salary income but income from business or profession. It allowed a 40% deduction for estimated expenses in earning the bonus. The court cited a Bombay High Court case where a similar decision was upheld, emphasizing that unless a finding is perverse or without material, it will not be questioned. As the Department did not challenge the classification of the bonus as business income, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision on the deduction. In conclusion, the court dismissed the petition, stating that the Tribunal's decision was based on available material and upheld the classification of the incentive bonus as income from business or profession.
|
