9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interim directions sought by the appellant in a disability pension case. Analysis: The appellant, an ex-serviceman injured during the 1965 Indo-Pakistan conflict, sought disability pension under Regulation 173 of Pension Regulations for Armed Forces personnel. The appellant's disability, assessed at 20%, met the criteria for disability pension. The medical report confirmed the disability's origin in the conflict, despite initial resistance from Army authorities. The Court dismissed arguments about the legality of the appellant's discharge and focused on awarding disability pension. The Court directed the respondents to compute the pension from April 1, 1968, considering the appellant's discharge due to disability. It noted the 15-year denial of pension, emphasizing the appellant's rightful entitlement and the respondents' unwarranted resistance. The Court ordered a lump sum payment of Rs. 50,000 to the appellant within four weeks, along with future monthly pension of Rs. 198 starting from October 1, 1983. The appellant was also entitled to interest, compensation for harassment, and litigation costs. The judgment ensured the appellant's prompt receipt of pension benefits and left room for additional benefits under liberalized pension rules. In conclusion, the Court granted the appellant disability pension, acknowledging his rightful entitlement despite past denials and resistance. The judgment aimed to provide immediate relief through a lump sum payment and monthly pension, emphasizing the appellant's long-overdue compensation and adherence to pension regulations.
|
