Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (1) TMI 1405 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Dispute over Cenvat credit availed for dumpers/tippers used in factory for movement of raw materials and finished products.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 11.12.2012, concerning the eligibility of Cenvat credit for dumpers/tippers used in the factory for movement of raw materials like ingots and coal. The Revenue contended that the appellant was not entitled to credit for dumpers/tippers classified under Tariff Heading No. 8704 23 19. The Original authority disallowed the credit amounting to ?5,19,960 along with interest and penalty, a decision upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the present appeal.

During the hearing, the appellant's counsel argued that Tribunal cases supported the allowance of Cenvat credit on dumpers/tippers. The Revenue, however, opposed this view, stating that credit is only permitted when such equipment is used as capital goods. The appellant had indeed utilized dumpers/tippers for the internal movement of raw materials and finished products within the factory, including ingots, billets, and coal.

The Tribunal analyzed the definition of capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2002, which includes components, spares, and accessories of goods specified as capital goods falling under certain chapters. Referring to a Supreme Court case, the Tribunal emphasized that processing and handling of raw materials within the factory are integral to manufacturing operations. Consequently, dumpers/tippers used within the factory were deemed eligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, a stance supported by previous Tribunal decisions.

Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the Impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. The judgment was pronounced in the Open Court on 30.01.2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates