9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Assessment of undisclosed income and cash credits in the business of vermilion and sindoor for the Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1947-48. Determination of the previous year for the undisclosed income of Rs. 15,000. Analysis: The case involves a Hindu undivided family engaged in the business of vermilion and sindoor, where the Income-tax Officer rejected the account books due to lack of proper maintenance. The Officer estimated the net profit at Rs. 10,877 and treated unexplained cash credits of Rs. 15,000 as secret profits. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision, leading to an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal considered whether the undisclosed income of Rs. 15,000 should be taxed in the assessment year 1947-48 or the financial year 1945-46. The Tribunal concluded that the cash credits were not related to the vermilion business but from a different source, thus determining the previous year for this income. The Income-tax Department argued that the undisclosed profit should be attributed to the same business, but the Court disagreed. It emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the assessee to explain cash receipts, and in this case, the receipts were deemed to be from a different source based on factual findings. The Court referenced previous cases to distinguish when undisclosed income should be attributed to the same business or a separate source. It highlighted that in this instance, the undisclosed income of Rs. 15,000 was not linked to the vermilion business, supporting the Tribunal's decision on the previous year for taxation. In conclusion, the Court held that the previous year for the undisclosed income of Rs. 15,000 was the financial year ending on 31st March 1946, ruling in favor of the assessee. The judgment was supported by both Ramaswami and Misra, JJ., and the assessee was awarded costs for the reference.
|
