Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Board Companies Law - 2014 (12) TMI Board This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (12) TMI 1288 - Board - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
1. Whether MVL Limited (MVL) is operating a Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) without obtaining registration from SEBI.
2. Whether the activities of MVL and its directors are in violation of the SEBI Act and CIS Regulations.
3. Directions to be issued to MVL and its directors for compliance and remedial actions.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether MVL Limited (MVL) is operating a Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) without obtaining registration from SEBI:

SEBI came across an advertisement by MVL soliciting investments for its 'India Business Centre' (IBC Project) at Gurgaon, promising assured returns. SEBI sought details from MVL to ascertain if it was operating a CIS. MVL claimed it was in the real estate business and not receiving contributions from investors. However, SEBI found that MVL was mobilizing funds from the public through schemes that appeared to be CIS without SEBI registration, violating Section 12(1B) of the SEBI Act and CIS Regulations.

MVL's submissions indicated that it offered IT/cyber spaces under various plans, including an assured return plan. The agreements did not clearly identify specific units, and the payments were pooled for the project. MVL also offered a buy-back option, further indicating a CIS. SEBI concluded that MVL's operations satisfied all four conditions of a CIS under Section 11AA(2) of the SEBI Act, including pooling of funds, expectation of returns, management on behalf of investors, and lack of day-to-day control by investors.

2. Whether the activities of MVL and its directors are in violation of the SEBI Act and CIS Regulations:

SEBI found that MVL and its directors were engaged in fund mobilizing activities by floating unregistered CIS, violating Section 11AA of the SEBI Act. The directors were held responsible for the illegal conduct of MVL's business. SEBI noted that MVL's activities were not pure real estate transactions but involved pooling of funds and offering assured returns, characteristic of CIS. MVL's failure to provide complete documentation and inconsistencies in its agreements further supported SEBI's findings.

3. Directions to be issued to MVL and its directors for compliance and remedial actions:

SEBI issued several directions to MVL and its directors:
- Abstain from collecting money from investors or launching any new CIS.
- Wind up existing CIS and refund collected monies with due returns within three months.
- Submit a winding-up and repayment report to SEBI within fifteen days after the refund period.
- Not to alienate or dispose of any assets except for making refunds.
- Submit a detailed inventory of MVL's assets.

In case of non-compliance, SEBI would:
- Restrain MVL and its directors from accessing the securities market until all CIS are wound up and refunds are made.
- Refer the matter to State Government/Local Police for civil/criminal cases and to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for winding up MVL.
- Initiate attachment and recovery proceedings under the SEBI Act.

Additionally, MVL and its directors were restrained from accessing the securities market for four years. SEBI would also consider further proceedings for contraventions found in the order.

Conclusion:

SEBI concluded that MVL was operating unregistered CIS, violating the SEBI Act and CIS Regulations. MVL and its directors were directed to wind up the schemes, refund the monies, and were restrained from accessing the securities market. SEBI's order aimed to protect investors and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates