Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (4) TMI 1259 - HC - Income TaxDeletion of TPA on account of AMP Expenses relying upon the decisions of Bausch & Lomb Eyecare (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (2015 (12) TMI 1332 - DELHI HIGH COURT) - Held that - As far as the above issue is concerned it is covered by the earlier decisions of this Court against the Revenue. This Court is not inclined to frame any substantial question of law on this issue. Notice is confined to the second issue raised in the appeal concerning allowing of deduction under Section 10A of the Act.
Issues:
1. Transfer pricing adjustment of Advertising, Marketing, and Sales Promotion Expenses (AMP Expenses). 2. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. Transfer Pricing Adjustment Issue: The High Court addressed the first issue regarding the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment of &8377; 75,40,09,515/- on account of AMP Expenses. The Revenue raised this issue against the order passed by the ITAT for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Court noted that the deletion of the adjustment was based on previous decisions, including the case of Bausch & Lomb Eyecare (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. The Court found that this issue was already covered by its earlier decisions against the Revenue, and therefore, no substantial question of law was framed on this matter. Deduction under Section 10A Issue: The second issue raised in the appeal concerned the allowing of a deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. The Court limited its notice to this particular issue. During the proceedings, Mr. Mayank Nagi, representing the Respondent, accepted the notice on behalf of the Respondent. The Court scheduled the next hearing for 22nd May 2017 to further address this issue. The judgment focused on this specific issue, indicating that it required separate consideration and was distinct from the transfer pricing adjustment matter.
|