9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves issues related to violation of Section 13(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by a charitable institution, denial of benefit under Section 11, advancing money to trustees, computation of income, and application of depreciation while computing income under Section 11. Violation of Section 13(1)(c): The Assessing Officer found that the charitable institution violated Section 13(1)(c) by giving funds to interested parties associated with the institution, leading to benefits for them. The denial of benefit under Section 11 was based on these findings. Advance to Trustees: The institution had advanced money to a trustee for the purchase of land, but the property purchase did not materialize before the trustee's demise. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) found that the advance was made for a legitimate purpose, and the intention to purchase the land was clear. Computation of Income and Depreciation: The judgment addressed the computation of income for a charitable institution under Section 11, emphasizing the allowance of depreciation as per normal accounting principles. It clarified that there is no double benefit as depreciation is allowed while computing income, and the money spent on acquiring assets is considered an application of funds for charitable purposes. Judgment Summary: The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai heard appeals and cross-objections related to the violation of Section 13(1)(c) by a charitable institution for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The institution, engaged in educational activities, faced scrutiny for providing funds to interested parties, leading to the denial of benefits under Section 11. In detailed examinations, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) found that the institution's accounting practices did not violate Section 13(1)(c) and allowed the benefit under Section 11. The advance made to a trustee for land purchase was deemed legitimate, considering the trustee's passing and the subsequent need for legal processes. Regarding income computation and depreciation, the Tribunal clarified that depreciation allowance is essential while computing income, and the money spent on assets is considered a charitable fund application. There is no double benefit as depreciation is allowed in the first segment of income computation, and asset acquisition is treated separately for charitable purposes. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and allowed the institution's cross-objections, directing the Assessing Officer to compute income after providing for depreciation and treating asset acquisition expenses as charitable fund applications.
|
