Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 1980 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1980 (11) TMI 168 - HC - Indian Laws

Issues:
1. Validity of arbitration agreement and reference.
2. Entitlement to file a fresh application for injunction after withdrawal of previous application.

Analysis:
1. The case involves an appeal challenging the dismissal of an application for a temporary injunction against arbitration proceedings. The parties had entered into an arbitration agreement, but the appellants disputed the claim filed by the respondents before the arbitration association. The appellants filed a suit claiming no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties. The trial court dismissed the application for injunction, stating the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case or irreparable injury. The appellants then filed a fresh application for injunction, which was also dismissed by the trial court on the grounds of lack of merit.

2. The main grounds of challenge by the appellants were the absence of a dispute between the parties for arbitration and the invalidity of the arbitration reference made by the respondents without appellant's consent or notice. However, the court focused on whether the appellants were entitled to file a fresh application for injunction after withdrawing the previous application. The court cited Order 23, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, which precludes a plaintiff from filing a fresh suit on the same cause of action after withdrawing a suit. The court held that the present application for injunction was not maintainable under this rule, as there was no change in circumstances since the dismissal of the previous application. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

In conclusion, the court's decision was based on the procedural aspect of filing a fresh application for injunction after withdrawal of the previous application, rather than delving into the validity of the arbitration agreement or reference. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the appellants were precluded from filing a new application under Order 23, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates