9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment addresses the issue of whether the expenditure incurred by a company on the foreign tour of one of its directors, and his wife, should be included as income of the wife under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Details of the Judgment: The Income-tax Officer reopened the assessment and included the amount spent on the foreign tour in the total income of the assessee. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner dismissed the appeal, stating there was no evidence the tour was for business purposes. The Tribunal found no evidence the assessee sought the benefit and allowed the appeal, excluding the sum from the income. The Revenue appealed to the High Court. The High Court considered whether the assessee obtained any benefit from the company. The definition of "income" under section 2(24) was analyzed, focusing on the term "benefit" in clause (iv). The court interpreted "benefit" as any advantage, gain, or improvement in condition obtained by the assessee from the company. The court found that the assessee had not approached the company for the tours, which were undertaken for business purposes. The tours were requested by the company to build relationships for negotiations with foreign corporations. As the assessee did not derive personal gain and did not incur any obligation, the expenditure was not includible as income under section 2(24)(iv). In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the expenditure on the foreign tours was not to be included as income under section 2(24)(iv). The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.
|
