9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Classification of interest amount as revenue receipt. 2. Accounting system followed by the assessee post-business termination. 3. Deduction of interest paid to the Federal Bank during previous assessment years. 4. Deduction of interest paid to the Federal Bank during the relevant assessment year. Summary: Issue 1: Classification of Interest Amount as Revenue Receipt The Tribunal held that the interest amount of Rs. 36,066.70 payable to the assessee as per the arbitrator's award is a revenue receipt. This decision was based on the precedent set in Rockwell Engineering Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 277, where interest awarded due to delayed payments was considered an accretion to the amounts due under the contract and thus a revenue receipt. The court affirmed this view, stating that the interest is attributable and incidental to the business carried on by the assessee. Therefore, the interest amount is taxable for the assessment year 1979-80. Question No. 1 was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. Issue 2: Accounting System Followed by the Assessee Post-Business Termination The Tribunal, along with the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, concluded that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of its business in 1974. This finding was based on the records and was not contested with any contrary material. Consequently, the interest amount received during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1979-80 is assessable in that year. Question No. 2 was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. Issue 3: Deduction of Interest Paid to the Federal Bank During Previous Assessment Years The assessee claimed that interest paid to the Federal Bank during previous accounting periods should be deducted from the amounts received under the arbitration award. The Tribunal disallowed this deduction based on its finding that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of the business. The court agreed with this view, stating that only the interest paid during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year can be deducted. Question No. 3 was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. Issue 4: Deduction of Interest Paid to the Federal Bank During the Relevant Assessment Year The Department contended that no deduction should be allowed for the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the assessment year. However, the court held that u/s 176(3A), the sum received after the discontinuance of the business should be deemed as income and charged to tax accordingly. The interest paid to the bank during the accounting year in which the interest on delayed payment was received must be deducted from the amount received. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to claim this deduction. Question No. 4 was answered in the affirmative, against the Department and in favor of the assessee. Conclusion: The court upheld the Tribunal's decisions on all four issues, affirming that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee followed the cash system of accounting post-business termination, and deductions for interest paid to the Federal Bank are allowable only for the relevant assessment year.
|
