Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2010 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (5) TMI 457 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Dismissal of appeals by the Commissioner (Appeals) based on the question of limitation.
2. Consideration of condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944.
3. Interpretation of provisions under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994 for filing appeals.
4. Decision on whether the delay in filing appeals could have been condoned by the Commissioner (Appeals).
5. Setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals by way of remand for consideration on merits.

Analysis:
1. The appeals were dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) solely on the grounds of limitation. The Tribunal observed that the appeals could have been disposed of without the condition of pre-deposit, leading to the decision to take up the appeals for disposal.

2. The appellant had filed appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeals by 28 days under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had taken steps for filing the appeal and had submitted an application for condonation of delay within the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) to condone.

3. The Tribunal considered the provisions of Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, which allows appeals to be filed within 90 days from the date of receipt of the Order-in-Original. The appellant had filed the appeals under Form ST-4, indicating a belief that the appeal should be filed under Section 85. The Tribunal found that the delay of 28 days was within the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) to condone.

4. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision to dismiss the appeals for delay, stating that the delay could have been condoned. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the appeals on merits and dispose of them accordingly.

5. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals by remand, emphasizing that the Commissioner (Appeals) should have condoned the delay and proceeded to consider the appeals on their merits. The stay petitions were also disposed of in light of the decision to allow the appeals for further consideration.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates