Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (5) TMI 118 - AT - Central ExciseInterest - Penalty - Belated reversal of CENVAT credit - The assessees are engaged in the manufacture of motor car components and parts thereo - Not pay interest on belated reversal of wrongly availed credit - The Tribunal which had decided in the case of CCE Pondicherry Vs Superfil Products that interest liability arises only on utilization of irregular credit and the Supreme Court s decision cited (2011 -TMI - 202107 - Supreme Court) holding that the interest liability arises right from the date of availment of irregular credit - Held that the issue of payment of interest was debatable and became finally settled only with the apex court s decision cited and, therefore, assessees cannot be held liable to penalty as the circumstances do not warrant imposition of penalty.
Issues:
- Whether interest on wrongly availed CENVAT credit is payable from the date of availing the credit or only from the date of its utilization? - Whether penalties imposed on the assessees for not paying interest on belated reversal of wrongly availed credit are justified? Analysis: The assessees, engaged in manufacturing motor car components, had taken CENVAT credit multiple times on the same input invoices. Upon detection by the department, they reversed the credit but did not pay interest on the belated reversal. Subsequently, show cause notices (SCNs) were issued for recovery of interest and imposition of penalties. The interest amounts were confirmed, and penalties were imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to appeals before the Tribunal. During the hearing, the assessees argued that they had paid the interest amounts following a Supreme Court judgment in Union of India Vs Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd., which clarified that interest on irregular credit accrues from the date of availing the credit, not just from its utilization. The Tribunal noted that a previous case, CCE Pondicherry Vs Superfil Products, had held that interest liability arises only upon credit utilization. The Supreme Court's decision in February 2011 established that interest liability starts from the date of availing irregular credit. Considering the debatable nature of the issue before the apex court's ruling, the Tribunal concluded that the assessees cannot be penalized for not paying interest earlier. Therefore, the penalties imposed on the assessees were set aside. The appeals were partly allowed, upholding the liability to interest (already paid by the assessees) but canceling the penalties.
|