9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the investment in fixed deposits constitutes acquiring "another capital asset" u/s 11(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the trust exercised a valid option to invest the balance of capital gains in the following previous year. Summary: Issue 1: Investment in Fixed Deposits as Capital Assets The primary question was whether making a fixed deposit for 60 days with a bank could be considered as acquiring a new capital asset within the meaning of section 11(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue contended that the deposit of sale proceeds with the bank does not convert the proceeds into a new asset, maintaining that the proceeds continue to be a cash fund. Conversely, the assessee argued that fixed deposits are distinct from liquid cash and transform the sale proceeds into a capital asset. The court examined various provisions, including section 11(5) of the Act, which specifies deposits in scheduled banks as permissible modes of investment for trust funds. The court also considered section 54E, which exempts long-term capital gains when sale proceeds are invested in specified new assets, including bank deposits. Additionally, the court referenced the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, which treats bank deposits as distinct assets. The court concluded that the relationship between a banker and a depositor is that of debtor and creditor, not bailor and bailee. Depositing money in a bank results in the acquisition of a new asset, as the ownership of the money passes to the bank. The court also noted that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had issued a circular recognizing fixed deposits for six months or more as capital assets u/s 11(1A), although the court found no rationale for the six-month minimum duration. Issue 2: Valid Option to Invest Balance Capital Gains The Tribunal held that the trust had exercised a valid option to invest the balance capital gains in the next succeeding previous year. The court did not delve into the subsequent use of the funds after the fixed deposit matured, leaving that issue to be decided by the income-tax authorities in the following assessment year. Conclusion: The court answered the questions in the affirmative, ruling in favor of the Revenue. The net consideration from the sale of any capital asset, when deposited in a bank, results in the conversion into a new asset within the meaning of section 11(1A). There was no order as to costs.
|
