9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether investment in public sector undertakings constitutes a capital asset u/s 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the Tribunal's finding on the assessee-trust's investment in Unit Trust of India units was based on proper evidence. 3. Whether the entire sale proceeds from shares were invested in acquiring other capital assets u/s 11(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 4. Whether the assessee-trust was entitled to exemption u/s 11(1A) for capital gains on the sale of shares. 5. Whether there was an extinguishment of the assessee's right in debenture stock u/s 2(47) read with section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 6. Whether the assessee incurred a capital loss in respect of the debenture stock. Judgment Summary: Issue 1: Investment in Public Sector Undertakings as Capital Asset The court addressed whether fixed deposits with public sector undertakings could be considered a capital asset u/s 2(14). The Tribunal held that such deposits amounted to the acquisition of capital assets, thus fulfilling the conditions of section 11(1A). The court agreed, stating that investments or deposits in public sector companies are capital assets, as defined broadly in section 2(14). Issue 2: Tribunal's Finding on Unit Trust of India Investment The Tribunal found that the assessee had invested in Unit Trust of India units during the relevant year, despite the delay in issuing the certificates. The court upheld this finding, noting that the investment was made within the accounting period, and the issuance delay was immaterial. Issue 3: Investment of Sale Proceeds in Capital Assets The court examined whether the sale proceeds from shares were reinvested in new capital assets within the meaning of section 11(1A). The Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the assessee had acquired new capital assets, including fixed deposits and units of the Unit Trust of India. The court affirmed this, allowing the exemption for the capital gains. Issue 4: Exemption u/s 11(1A) for Capital Gains The court confirmed that the assessee-trust was entitled to exemption u/s 11(1A) for capital gains, as the net consideration from the sale of shares was utilized in acquiring new capital assets. The Tribunal's decision to uphold the exemption was affirmed. Issue 5: Extinguishment of Rights in Debenture Stock The court considered whether there was an extinguishment of the assessee's right in the debenture stock u/s 2(47) read with section 45. The Tribunal had held that the assessee suffered a long-term capital loss due to the extinguishment of rights. However, the court disagreed, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Vania Silk Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT, which clarified that the extinguishment of an asset itself does not constitute a transfer. Issue 6: Capital Loss on Debenture Stock The court ruled that the loss incurred by the assessee due to the debenture stock becoming valueless was not a capital loss under the head "Capital gains" since no transfer was involved. The Tribunal's conclusion on this matter was not upheld. Conclusion: The court answered the first, second, third, and fourth questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The fifth and sixth questions were answered in the negative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. There was no order as to costs.
|
