9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Justification of cancelling penalty under section 273(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The case involved a question of law regarding the cancellation of a penalty of Rs. 12,230 imposed under section 273(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a partner in a firm, was required to pay advance tax for the financial year 1974-75 relevant to the assessment year 1975-76. The Income-tax Officer demanded advance tax based on the assessed income, and the difference between the tax finally determined and the advance tax demanded was more than 33 1/3 per cent. The assessee failed to revise the estimate of advance tax as required by law, leading to the penalty imposition. The assessee contended that due to heavy additions in the firm's assessment, the income increased unexpectedly, and it was agreed during previous proceedings that partners would not be penalized for defaults. The Income-tax Officer concluded that the assessee should have filed a higher income estimate and imposed a penalty. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the penalty, stating that the assessee knew about the increased income due to search operations. In the appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, it was argued that the firm and partners were prevented by reasonable cause from estimating income, supported by the partner's severe heart attack during the relevant period. The Tribunal found that the assessee was indeed prevented by reasonable cause, considering it a factual finding. The Tribunal ultimately held that the penalty cancellation was justified under section 273(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in favor of the assessee. The decision favored the assessee and went against the Revenue.
|
