9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of consideration received for the transfer of capital asset at a specific rate per share. Analysis: The judgment by the High Court of Gujarat involved three references under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the question was whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in determining the full value of consideration received for the transfer of a capital asset at the rate of Rs. 50 per share. The case revolved around three brothers who were directors in a company facing significant losses and liabilities. They entered into an agreement to sell shares at Re. 1 per share to relieve themselves of guarantor liabilities. The key issue was whether the consideration received was truly Rs. 50 per share or Re. 1 per share as per the agreement. The court examined the facts and the agreement, noting that the shares were initially purchased at Rs. 50 per share from outsiders and then sold to a purchaser at Re. 1 per share. However, the court found that the Re. 1 per share did not reflect the actual value of the shares. The agreement encompassed not only the sale of shares but also the release of the brothers from their guarantor obligations. The court emphasized that the consideration for selling the shares at Re. 1 per share included the release from liabilities, as evident from clauses 6 to 11 of the agreement. Therefore, the court concluded that the difference of Rs. 49 per share, claimed as a loss, was part of the consideration for the release of liabilities. Consequently, the court determined that the brothers had indeed received the full amount of Rs. 50 per share as consideration, and they had not incurred any actual loss in the transaction. Ultimately, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the consideration received for the transfer of shares was correctly assessed at Rs. 50 per share. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, disposing of the references with no order as to costs.
|
