Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (12) TMI 638 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Delay in filing appeals by the department.
2. Allowance of Cenvat credit on GTA service to the assessee.
3. Conditions for availing Cenvat credit on service tax paid on GTA service.
4. Assessment of whether the conditions for Cenvat credit were met by the assessee.
5. Decision on the department's stay applications.

Analysis:
1. The judgment addresses the delay in filing appeals by the department against a common order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal notes the delay but condones it due to the absence of opposition. The first appeal was filed within time, while supplementary appeals were filed with delay, which was condoned.

2. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed Cenvat credit on GTA service to the assessee, considering freight charges as an integral part of the goods' price borne by the assessee. The department referred to a Board's Circular and a High Court judgment setting conditions for availing Cenvat credit on service tax paid on GTA service.

3. The High Court's judgment established three conditions for claiming Cenvat credit on GTA service: non-transfer of goods ownership, seller bearing risk during transit, and freight charges being integral to goods value. The judgment cited 'FOR Destination' price delivery fulfilling these conditions.

4. The Tribunal found that the sales were on 'FOR Destination' basis, and freight charges were integral to the goods' price. The department did not challenge these findings, and the appellant did not contest the satisfaction of the prescribed conditions. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the Cenvat credit on GTA service should be allowed to the respondent.

5. Based on the above analysis and the satisfaction of conditions, the Tribunal dismissed the department's stay applications regarding the appellate Commissioner's order. The decision was made in line with the High Court's judgment and the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the Cenvat credit eligibility for the respondent.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates