9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Proper interpretation and construction of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976. 2. Applicability of sections 9 and 10 to disclosures made under section 14 of the Act. 3. Entitlement to refund of tax paid under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976. Detailed Analysis: 1. Proper Interpretation and Construction of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976: The court analyzed the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976, which replaced the Ordinance of 1975. The Act aimed to provide an opportunity for individuals who had evaded tax to disclose their undisclosed income and wealth, pay tax thereon, and return to civic responsibility. The court emphasized the different sections of the Act, particularly sections 3, 8, 9, 10, and 14, to understand their implications and applications. 2. Applicability of Sections 9 and 10 to Disclosures Made Under Section 14 of the Act: The court examined whether sections 9 and 10 of the Act would apply to disclosures made under section 14. Section 9 restricts the declarant from reopening any assessment or reassessment or claiming any set-off or relief in any appeal, reference, or other proceedings. Section 10 states that any amount of income-tax paid under a declaration made under section 3(1) shall not be refundable. The court noted that section 14 deals specifically with cases involving search and seizure and allows declarations for income not disclosed in returns before October 8, 1975. The court concluded that sections 9 and 10 are intended for disclosures under section 3 and not section 14, as the latter has distinct provisions and purposes. 3. Entitlement to Refund of Tax Paid Under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976: The court discussed the entitlement to a refund of tax paid under the Act. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had allowed refunds based on the interpretation that sections 9 and 10 did not apply to disclosures under section 14. The court highlighted that section 14(6) mandates that tax paid by the declarant should be credited in the assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961. This provision supports the argument that refunds could be permissible for declarations under section 14, unlike those under section 3, where section 10 explicitly prohibits refunds. Conclusion: The court found that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal did not thoroughly examine whether the basic conditions for the applicability of sections 3 or 14 were met, such as the date of search and seizure and whether the items mentioned in section 14(1) were seized. The court returned the reference unanswered and directed the Tribunal to rehear the parties and decide the matter based on the observations made, ensuring that the conditions stipulated for sections 3 and 14 are strictly fulfilled. Final Judgment: The reference was returned unanswered, and the Income-tax Tribunal was directed to hear the parties again and decide the matter in accordance with the observations made by the court. No order as to costs was made.
|
