Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (3) TMI 1100 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Whether the appellant is entitled to the cenvat credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering services.

Analysis:
The judgment dealt with the issue of whether the appellant could claim cenvat credit for service tax paid on outdoor catering services. The appellant relied on a Tribunal decision regarding the eligibility of outdoor caterer's service in a manufacturer's canteen as an input service. However, the appellate authority denied the benefit, stating that the appellant failed to provide evidence showing that the cost of catering contributed to the cost of production. The Tribunal examined the Larger Bench decision and found that the benefit of credit was not contingent on the cost being added to the assessable value, as it generally contributes to the final product cost.

Furthermore, the judgment referenced a case where the High Court observed that providing canteen services to staff was mandatory under the Factories Act and fell within the definition of input services. The High Court highlighted that input services need not be directly used in manufacturing final products but could be indirectly related to production. The Tribunal upheld that the service tax on outdoor catering services by a canteen in a manufacturing premises constituted an input service eligible for CENVAT credit, in line with the Rules. As the decision was consistent with the legal provisions, the appeal was dismissed without any legal infirmity.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief to the appellant based on the decisions discussed. The stay petition was also disposed of in favor of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates