Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (12) TMI 965 - HC - Income TaxAmounts paid by the Samitees to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board under statutory obligation - whether it is application of its receipts entitling exemption under section/allowance from the income - Held that - Mandi Act envisages market areas in the State and the Samitis to govern it. The Samities are a body established and incorporated under section 12 of the Mandi Act - The amount of Mandi Shulk as well as Development Cess sent by the different Mandi Samitis to the State Agricultural Produce Market Board is a utilisation of all the receipts. The amount of Mandi Shulk as well as Development Cess sent by the different Mandi Samitis to the State Agricultural Produce Market Board is a utilisation of all the receipts and the Tribunal as well as Commissioner (Appeals) have rightly deleted the addition.
Issues:
- Whether amounts paid by Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samitis to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board under statutory obligation qualify for exemption under the Income Tax Act. Analysis: 1. Facts and Background: - The appeals pertain to Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2005-07 under the Income Tax Act involving different Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samitis incorporated under the UP Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Adhiniyam, 1964. - The main issue is whether the amounts paid by the Samitis to the State Agriculture Produce Markets Board are eligible for exemption under the IT Act. 2. Assessing Officer's Disallowance: - The Assessing Officer disallowed the amounts paid by the Samitis to the Board, stating it was not proper utilization and thus not eligible for exemption. 3. Appeals and Tribunal Orders: - The Samitis appealed, and the Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in their favor, allowing the exemption for the amounts sent to the Board. - The Income Tax Department then filed appeals before the Tribunal, which were dismissed, leading to the present appeals before the High Court. 4. Court's Decision and Reasoning: - The Court highlighted the purpose of the Mandi Act to ensure fair prices for agricultural produce by regulating agricultural markets through Samitis and the Board. - It was noted that the Samitis are established under the Mandi Act, which also mandates sending a portion of collected amounts to the Board for market development. - The Court referred to a previous decision where it was held that the Samitis are entitled to registration under the IT Act. - Emphasizing that the amounts sent to the Board are utilized for market development and management, the Court concluded that the Samitis are entitled to claim exemption/allowances for the same. - The Court also cited a similar ruling by the Rajasthan High Court in a comparable case, supporting its decision. 5. Conclusions and Dismissal of Appeals: - The High Court concluded that the amounts sent by the Samitis to the Board constitute proper utilization of collected funds, entitling them to exemption. - It upheld the decisions of the Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) in deleting the additions, stating that there was no merit in the appeals. - Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals in light of its conclusions.
|