Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + CGOVT Customs - 2009 (11) TMI CGOVT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (11) TMI 645 - CGOVT - CustomsRevision Application - Foreign currency - illegal import - confiscation and penalty - held that - a compulsory requirement of making a Custom Declaration Form (CDF) is the legal requirement specifically when the impugned foreign currency involved is more then US 5000 ( or equivalent). In this case the applicant has not made any declaration In CDF. - there is no Independent documentary evidence so as to confirm that presently seized foreign currency is necessarily from the unspent amount of that particular transaction/visit. Only proper CDF could be the connecting legal document which is very much missing in this case. In absence of such a vital link the entire theory/submissions appears to be an after thought and excuse. - Decided against the assessee. Government observes that the confiscation of foreign currency under Section 113(d)(l) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with provisions of FEMA (Export and Import of Currency) Regulations, 2000 for violation of Section 77 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with relevant provisions/notifications from RBI and imposition of penalty under Section 114(i) of the Act, ibid cannot be assailed and was rightly adjudged by the lower authorities as per available admissible evidence/facts on record. - however redemption fine and penalty reduced.
Issues Involved:
1. Legality of the seizure of foreign currency. 2. Justification of the penalties imposed. 3. Compliance with Customs and FEMA regulations. Detailed Analysis: 1. Legality of the Seizure of Foreign Currency: The appellant was intercepted at Kolkata Airport while leaving for London and was found with undeclared foreign currency valued at Rs. 3,73,609/-. The appellant failed to produce any licit document supporting the legal acquisition, possession, or exportation of the currency. Consequently, the currency was seized under the reasonable belief that it was being smuggled out of the country in violation of the Customs Act, 1962, and FEMA, 1999, rendering it liable for confiscation under Section 113(d) and (l) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. Justification of the Penalties Imposed: The seized currency was initially confiscated with an option to redeem it upon payment of a Redemption Fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- and a penalty of Rs. 75,000/- under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) upheld the confiscation but reduced the Redemption Fine to Rs. 1 lakh and the penalty to Rs. 50,000/-. The appellant argued that the Commissioner failed to consider that the foreign currency was part of the currency drawn from an RBI-authorized money exchanger and that the penalties should be waived. 3. Compliance with Customs and FEMA Regulations: The government reviewed the case and noted that the appellant did not deny the factual recovery of the foreign currencies. The appellant's main defense was that the currency was part of the money brought back from his visit to Malaysia. However, the appellant failed to make a declaration in the Currency Declaration Form (CDF) required under Regulation 6 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Export and Import of Currency) Regulations, 2000, for amounts exceeding US $5,000 or its equivalent. The lack of a CDF rendered the appellant's claim unverifiable, leading the government to conclude that the appellant intentionally attempted to export the currency illegally. Conclusion: The government upheld the confiscation of the foreign currency under Section 113(d)(l) of the Customs Act, 1962, read with FEMA regulations, and the imposition of penalties under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act. However, considering the overall circumstances, the government found the penalties harsh and reduced the Redemption Fine to Rs. 50,000/- and the penalty to Rs. 25,000/-. The order-in-appeal was upheld with these modifications, and the Revision Application was disposed of accordingly.
|