Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2011 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (3) TMI 1373 - HC - Service Tax


  1. 2013 (1) TMI 304 - HC
  2. 2024 (9) TMI 1024 - AT
  3. 2023 (9) TMI 566 - AT
  4. 2023 (5) TMI 971 - AT
  5. 2022 (11) TMI 1188 - AT
  6. 2021 (9) TMI 536 - AT
  7. 2021 (8) TMI 806 - AT
  8. 2020 (10) TMI 1005 - AT
  9. 2020 (9) TMI 938 - AT
  10. 2020 (4) TMI 674 - AT
  11. 2020 (2) TMI 1579 - AT
  12. 2020 (3) TMI 74 - AT
  13. 2019 (11) TMI 1070 - AT
  14. 2019 (9) TMI 220 - AT
  15. 2019 (7) TMI 1985 - AT
  16. 2019 (3) TMI 970 - AT
  17. 2018 (9) TMI 499 - AT
  18. 2018 (7) TMI 769 - AT
  19. 2018 (6) TMI 194 - AT
  20. 2018 (5) TMI 564 - AT
  21. 2018 (5) TMI 612 - AT
  22. 2018 (5) TMI 488 - AT
  23. 2018 (3) TMI 989 - AT
  24. 2018 (2) TMI 1043 - AT
  25. 2017 (12) TMI 836 - AT
  26. 2018 (4) TMI 1169 - AT
  27. 2017 (12) TMI 1155 - AT
  28. 2017 (11) TMI 2031 - AT
  29. 2017 (12) TMI 1097 - AT
  30. 2018 (2) TMI 231 - AT
  31. 2018 (2) TMI 143 - AT
  32. 2017 (11) TMI 425 - AT
  33. 2017 (9) TMI 1876 - AT
  34. 2017 (8) TMI 835 - AT
  35. 2017 (8) TMI 634 - AT
  36. 2017 (7) TMI 968 - AT
  37. 2017 (6) TMI 769 - AT
  38. 2017 (7) TMI 647 - AT
  39. 2017 (5) TMI 1461 - AT
  40. 2017 (4) TMI 487 - AT
  41. 2017 (8) TMI 460 - AT
  42. 2017 (3) TMI 642 - AT
  43. 2017 (1) TMI 1506 - AT
  44. 2017 (1) TMI 1282 - AT
  45. 2016 (12) TMI 812 - AT
  46. 2016 (12) TMI 839 - AT
  47. 2017 (3) TMI 16 - AT
  48. 2016 (10) TMI 676 - AT
  49. 2016 (8) TMI 123 - AT
  50. 2017 (2) TMI 841 - AT
  51. 2016 (8) TMI 7 - AT
  52. 2016 (6) TMI 1222 - AT
  53. 2016 (2) TMI 991 - AT
  54. 2015 (8) TMI 595 - AT
  55. 2015 (12) TMI 1442 - AT
  56. 2015 (10) TMI 1300 - AT
  57. 2015 (1) TMI 1336 - AT
  58. 2015 (10) TMI 113 - AT
  59. 2015 (2) TMI 271 - AT
  60. 2014 (9) TMI 749 - AT
  61. 2015 (3) TMI 297 - AT
  62. 2014 (8) TMI 672 - AT
  63. 2014 (7) TMI 241 - AT
  64. 2014 (3) TMI 516 - AT
  65. 2013 (8) TMI 601 - AT
  66. 2012 (11) TMI 741 - AT
  67. 2013 (12) TMI 1015 - AT
  68. 2012 (5) TMI 61 - AT
Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for input service tax credit on Shamiyana services and photography services.
2. Allegation of intention to evade duty and willful suppression of facts.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Input Service Tax Credit on Shamiyana Services and Photography Services:

The core issue revolves around whether expenses incurred for Shamiyana services and photography during Kannada Rajyostava Day and the inaugural function of Kengeri Police Station qualify as "input services" under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The assessee argued that these expenses are related to business activities and should be eligible for input service tax credit. The definition of "input service" under Rule 2(l) includes services used in relation to business activities like accounting, auditing, financing, and security, among others. The assessee contended that celebrating Kannada Rajyostava Day and involving the police in such functions ensures the security of the establishment and maintains industrial peace, thus falling under "activities relating to business."

The Tribunal initially rejected this claim, stating that such social functions do not fall within the ambit of business activities. However, the High Court interpreted the inclusive definition of "input service" to be extensive, covering various business-related activities, including security. The Court emphasized the importance of such celebrations in maintaining industrial peace and protecting the establishment, thus qualifying these expenses as input services eligible for CENVAT credit.

2. Allegation of Intention to Evade Duty and Willful Suppression of Facts:

The second issue pertains to whether the assessee had the intention to evade duty and willfully suppressed facts, which would attract the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal had concluded that there was no willful suppression or intention to evade duty, setting aside the demand on the basis that the claim was barred by time. The revenue challenged this conclusion, arguing that the show cause notice had indeed alleged suppression of facts.

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding, noting that the expenses were genuinely incurred for business-related activities and there was no personal benefit to the assessee. The Court found that the expenses were aimed at preserving the culture of the State, ensuring the welfare of employees, and maintaining peace and security, all of which are integral to the business. Consequently, the substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee, allowing CEA 47/2009 and dismissing CEA 100/2008.

Conclusion:

The High Court concluded that expenses incurred for Shamiyana services and photography during Kannada Rajyostava Day and the inaugural function of Kengeri Police Station fall within the definition of "input service" under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. These expenses are related to business activities, ensuring security and maintaining industrial peace. The Court also upheld the Tribunal's finding that there was no willful suppression or intention to evade duty by the assessee. Thus, the assessee was entitled to CENVAT credit for these expenses, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates