Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2010 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (4) TMI 854 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of "Hook and Loop Tape Fasteners" (Velcro Fasteners) under the TNGST Act.
2. Applicability of tax exemption under Section 8 of the TNGST Act.
3. Validity of the impugned clarification issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Tax (COCT).
4. Jurisdiction and procedural correctness of the COCT's order.
5. The interplay between the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (ADE Act) and the TNGST Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of "Hook and Loop Tape Fasteners" (Velcro Fasteners) under the TNGST Act:
The primary issue was whether "Hook and Loop Tape Fasteners" (Velcro Fasteners) should be classified under excise chapter heading No. 58.06 or 58.07. The COCT classified it under 58.07, which includes "Labels, badges and similar articles of textile materials," making it taxable at 12% under the residuary entry 40, Part D, First Schedule to the TNGST Act, 1959. The petitioners argued that it should fall under 58.06, which pertains to "Narrow Woven Fabric," and thus be exempt from tax under the TNGST Act.

2. Applicability of Tax Exemption under Section 8 of the TNGST Act:
Section 8 of the TNGST Act provides for exemption from tax for goods specified in the Third Schedule. The petitioners contended that "Hook and Loop Tape Fasteners" fall under the description of narrow woven fabrics as per heading 58.06, and thus should be exempt under Section 8. They supported their claim with various documents, including technical reports and classification lists approved by Central Excise authorities.

3. Validity of the Impugned Clarification Issued by the COCT:
The COCT's clarification, dated 18-4-2006, was challenged for being arbitrary and non-speaking. The court noted that the COCT did not provide adequate reasoning or consider all relevant materials submitted by the petitioners. The COCT's decision to classify the product under 58.07 was found to be without proper justification and contrary to earlier departmental clarifications and practices.

4. Jurisdiction and Procedural Correctness of the COCT's Order:
The court emphasized the necessity for the COCT to issue a speaking order with clear reasoning. The COCT's order was criticized for being based on ipse dixit and not providing the petitioners an opportunity to present their case adequately. The court found that the COCT's classification was an attempt to levy tax improperly by reclassifying the product under a different entry.

5. The Interplay between the ADE Act and the TNGST Act:
The court examined the relationship between the ADE Act and the TNGST Act, noting that goods subject to additional excise duty under the ADE Act are generally exempt from state sales tax under the TNGST Act. The court cited various judgments to support the principle that if a product is classified under a specific entry in the ADE Act, it should not be reclassified under a different entry for the purpose of levying state tax.

Conclusion:
The court set aside the COCT's clarification and declared that "Hook and Loop Tape Fasteners" fall under entry 58.06 and are exempt from tax under Section 8 of the TNGST Act. Consequently, the assessment and appellate orders based on the COCT's clarification were also set aside and remitted for fresh disposal in light of the court's judgment. All writ petitions were allowed, and no costs were imposed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates