9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Reopening of assessment u/s 147(b) for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. 2. Validity of reassessment proceedings based on the information leading to the belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. 3. Assessability of service charges as income from business in reassessment proceedings. 4. Allowance of depreciation and insurance premium in computing income from service charges u/s 57(2). Summary: Issue 1: Reopening of Assessment u/s 147(b) The Tribunal confirmed the reopening of the assessment for the years 1973-74 and 1974-75 by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on information that led to the belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. The AO noted that interest credited to the suspense account was not included in the total income, which was contested by the assessee on the grounds of irrecoverability and doubtfulness of debts. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the reopening was not based on an audit objection but on independent grounds. Issue 2: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were justified as the AO had reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment due to excessive depreciation allowance and other deductions not permissible under law. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in T.S. PL. P. Chidambaram Chettiar [1971] 80 ITR 467, stating that even vague information could justify reopening under section 147(b). The Tribunal also noted that the AO had not applied his mind to the details during the original assessment, thus justifying the reassessment. Issue 3: Assessability of Service Charges The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention that service charges should be assessed as income from business rather than under 'other sources'. The Tribunal noted that the machinery and plant were owned by the assessee and not let out, and the service charges were consistently assessed under 'other sources' in previous years. Issue 4: Depreciation and Insurance Premium The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation and insurance premium in computing income from service charges u/s 57(2). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that these deductions were not permissible under law and that the AO had not considered these details during the original assessment. Conclusion: The High Court concluded that the condition precedent for invoking section 147(b) was absent as there was no fresh material before the AO. The reassessment was deemed a mere change of opinion based on materials already considered during the original assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision was overturned, and question No. 1 was answered in the negative, in favor of the assessee. Questions Nos. 2, 3, and 4 were not addressed due to the resolution of question No. 1. There was no order as to costs.
|
