9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (10) TMI 677 - AT - Income TaxUnexplained cash credits - assessment ex parte u/s 144 - Held that - The assessee having appeared personally before the AO did not explain the source of cash of Rs.11 lacs deposited in his savings bank account despite sufficient opportunity allowed by the AO nor submitted any explanation before the CIT(A) even after seeking adjournment. As the assessee is now prepared to explain the source of cash deposited in his bank account in the interest of justice and fair play we vacate the findings of the CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the AO with the directions to allow another opportunity to the asssessee to explain the source of aforesaid cash subject to payment of cost of Rs.10, 000/- to the Revenue - in favour of assessee for statistical purposes.
Issues:
1. Addition of Rs.49,433 under chapter VI-A deduction and Rs.11 lacs on account of unexplained cash credits. 2. Non-compliance with notices issued by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A). 3. Disposal of appeal ex parte by the CIT(A). 4. Request for restoration of the matter to the AO for a fresh opportunity to explain the source of cash deposits. Analysis: Issue 1: Addition of Rs.49,433 and Rs.11 lacs The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions of Rs.49,433 and Rs.11 lacs to the income of the assessee on account of deduction under chapter VI-A and unexplained cash credits, respectively. The AO proceeded ex parte as the assessee did not respond to notices and failed to explain the source of the cash deposits. The CIT(A) confirmed the additions as the appellant did not provide any submissions or evidence despite multiple opportunities. Issue 2: Non-Compliance with Notices The assessee did not comply with the notices issued by the AO and the CIT(A), leading to the disposal of the appeal ex parte. Despite personal appearances before the AO and adjournment requests, the assessee did not respond to subsequent notices or file submissions. The lack of response and non-compliance raised concerns regarding the source of the cash deposits. Issue 3: Disposal of Appeal Ex Parte The CIT(A) disposed of the appeal ex parte due to the assessee's failure to provide any submissions or explanations regarding the unexplained cash deposits. The CIT(A) upheld the additions made by the AO as no further evidence was presented before them, resulting in the rejection of the grounds of appeal. Issue 4: Request for Restoration The assessee requested a fresh opportunity to explain the source of the cash deposits, which was supported by the AR. The Tribunal considered the request for restoration, vacated the CIT(A)'s findings, and directed the matter to be restored to the AO. The assessee was instructed to pay a cost of Rs.10,000 to the Revenue and provide necessary explanations to the AO for the expeditious disposal of the matter. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of compliance with notices and providing necessary explanations to tax authorities. The decision highlighted the need for fair play and justice in tax proceedings, ensuring that the assessee has the opportunity to clarify and substantiate financial transactions to avoid unwarranted additions to their income.
|
