Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2013 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (2) TMI 116 - HC - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
1. Winding up petitions and statutory compliance under the Companies Act.
2. Arbitration award and possession of factory premises.
3. Sale of property and confirmation of bid.
4. Supreme Court judgment and its implications.
5. Reinstallation of machinery and interest claims.
6. Applicability of SARFAESI Act.
7. Payment of statutory dues and electricity charges.
8. Valuation and payment to Ceylon Biscuits Ltd. (CBL).
9. Payment of past dues to ITCOT.
10. Sales tax dues.
11. Various applications by parties involved.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Winding up petitions and statutory compliance under the Companies Act:
In 2003, 16 winding-up petitions were filed against Bakemans Industries Pvt. Ltd. (BIPL) under Section 433(e) read with Section 433(f) and Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition by New Cawnpore Flour Mills Ltd. (NCFML) was admitted on 6th April 2004, directing publication of citations. Prior to this, SICOM issued notices under Section 29 of the SFC Act in January and June 2003.

2. Arbitration award and possession of factory premises:
Disputes between BIPL and a lead NRI Bank were referred to an Arbitral Tribunal, resulting in an award on 16th August 2003. Relying on this award, BIPL took possession of the factory on 14th September 2003. Subsequently, a court order on 15th September 2003 directed maintaining the status quo.

3. Sale of property and confirmation of bid:
Ceylon Biscuits Ltd. (CBL) expressed interest in bidding for BIPL's land and machinery, offering Rs. 12.5 crores and depositing earnest money. The Company Court confirmed the sale in favor of CBL on 17th July 2004.

4. Supreme Court judgment and its implications:
The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 16th May 2008, held that the Company Court erred in selling the property to CBL by treating SICOM as an agent. It emphasized compliance with the Companies Act and proper valuation of BIPL's assets before auction. CBL was to function as a Receiver under the Court's supervision until a final order was passed.

5. Reinstallation of machinery and interest claims:
Following the Supreme Court's order, CBL reinstalled dismantled machinery (Lines 5 and 6) at its expense. The Court ordered that Rs. 4 crores be held in a Fixed Deposit until the machinery was certified operational. CBL was awarded simple interest @ 5% p.a. on Rs. 12.5 crores from the date of payment till 10th January 2011.

6. Applicability of SARFAESI Act:
IFCI issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act on 8th June 2011. However, the Court set aside this notice, noting that the SARFAESI Act proceedings would lead to multiplicity and were impermissible in law, given the ongoing proceedings under the Companies Act.

7. Payment of statutory dues and electricity charges:
CBL was held liable for statutory dues and liabilities till 15th September 2008. The Court directed the reduction of the factory's electricity load to 15 KVA and instructed PSPC to lodge its claims with the Official Liquidator (OL).

8. Valuation and payment to Ceylon Biscuits Ltd. (CBL):
The Court ordered payment to CBL of Rs. 8,18,02,491.65 minus certain deductions, subject to verification of the inventory by ITCOT. CBL was permitted to take back its office equipment and furniture.

9. Payment of past dues to ITCOT:
The Court directed the OL to pay Rs. 3,35,209 to ITCOT from the Common Pool Fund for past valuation services.

10. Sales tax dues:
The Sales Tax Department of Maharashtra was permitted to file its claim for Rs. 95,55,924 with the OL, to be considered in accordance with law.

11. Various applications by parties involved:
The Court disposed of several applications, directing the OL to settle claims, scrutinize creditor and worker claims, and take steps for protecting BIPL's intellectual property rights. Applications that became infructuous were dismissed, with directions for fresh public notice inviting claims.

Directions:
1. Payment to CBL minus deductions, simultaneous with handing over possession to the OL.
2. Verification of assets by experts from OL, SICOM, IFCI, and ex-management.
3. Reduction of electricity load to 15 KVA.
4. ITCOT to submit a valuation report within six weeks.
5. OL to engage a security agency and retain workers for upkeep.
6. CBL to file an affidavit undertaking to clear any further statutory dues.
7. OL to decide PSPC's claims and settle current electricity bills.
8. Payment of past dues to ITCOT from the Common Pool Fund.
9. Setting aside the SARFAESI Act notice by IFCI.
10. Correcting the order dated 4th May 2012 to reflect the correct application number.
11. Directions for the OL to settle workmen's claims and scrutinize creditor claims.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates