9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Deductibility of ex gratia payment made in excess of statutory limit of 20% bonus. 2. Nature of payment of Rs. 3,31,900 as production incentive and its deductibility. Analysis: 1. The case involved the deduction of an ex gratia payment of Rs. 17,13,893 made by a public limited company to its employees, which was in excess of the statutory limit of 20% bonus. The Income-tax Officer disallowed this amount, considering it as an expenditure relating to a prior period. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held it to be a customary payment not covered by the Payment of Bonus Act and allowed the deduction. The High Court, referring to previous decisions, emphasized that any payment representing bonus should meet the conditions of reasonableness based on employee pay, business profits, and industry practice. The Court found the Appellate Tribunal's decision erroneous as it did not consider whether the ex gratia payment satisfied these conditions, leading to a negative answer in favor of the Revenue. 2. The second issue pertained to a payment of Rs. 3,31,900 classified as a production incentive. The Appellate Tribunal considered it as additional wages, allowing its deduction. However, the High Court found this decision lacking as the nature of the payment was not conclusively determined. The absence of the relevant agreement and failure to consider the Payment of Bonus Act's provisions led the Court to conclude that the Tribunal's decision was based on conjecture. Consequently, the Court ruled against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue, directing the Tribunal to reevaluate the nature of the payment and its deductibility under the Income-tax Act and Payment of Bonus Act. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment addressed the deductibility of both an ex gratia payment exceeding the statutory bonus limit and a payment labeled as production incentive. The Court emphasized the need for payments to meet specified criteria for deduction under the Income-tax Act, highlighting the importance of considering employee pay, business profits, and industry practices. The Court directed the Tribunal to reassess both payments to determine their eligibility for deduction based on the relevant legal provisions.
|
