Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2013 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (9) TMI 403 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Justification of CIT(A) in determining interest pertaining to the preoperative period at Rs. 524 lacs instead of Rs. 731.55 lacs.
2. Taxability of waiver of interest amounting to Rs. 731.55 lacs under section 41(1) and section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Determining Interest Pertaining to Preoperative Period:

The assessee, a Public Ltd Company engaged in manufacturing, had capitalized interest on loans taken for constructing a factory and purchasing machinery. The CIT(A) determined the interest pertaining to the preoperative period at Rs. 524 lacs as opposed to Rs. 731.55 lacs claimed by the assessee. The assessee argued that the interest waiver of Rs. 731.55 lacs, which pertained to the preoperative period, should not be taxed as it was a capital receipt. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) treated the sum of Rs. 731.55 lacs as a revenue receipt and added it to the income of the assessee. However, the Tribunal found that the interest pertaining to the preoperative period was capitalized to the cost of assets and not claimed as a deduction under sections 36(1)(iii) or 37 of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A)'s determination was not justified.

2. Taxability of Waiver of Interest under Section 41(1) and Section 28(iv):

The main contention was whether the waiver of interest amounting to Rs. 731.55 lacs should be taxed under section 41(1) or section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The A.O. and CIT(A) held that the waiver should be taxed as it provided a benefit to the assessee. The Tribunal, however, analyzed the provisions of section 41(1), which requires that an allowance or deduction must have been made in respect of loss, expenditure, or trading liability incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the interest pertaining to the preoperative period was capitalized and not claimed as a deduction in any previous year, thus not satisfying the conditions of section 41(1). The Tribunal relied on the decisions in CIT vs. Phool Chand Jiwan Ram and Polyflex (India) (P) Ltd. vs. CIT, which clarified that section 41(1) applies only to trading liabilities and not to capital receipts.

The Tribunal also examined section 28(iv) and concluded that it was not applicable as the waiver of interest did not arise from the business or exercise of a profession but was related to capital assets. The Tribunal found that the waiver of loan amount could not be considered as income since it was capital in nature and not a trading liability.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the waiver of interest amounting to Rs. 731.55 lacs was not taxable under section 41(1) or section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The interest pertaining to the preoperative period was correctly treated as a capital receipt, and the addition made by the A.O. was unjustified.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates