Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2013 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (10) TMI 685 - AT - Service Tax


Issues: Application for waiver of pre-deposit of CENVAT Credit, penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and penalty under Section 77 of the said Act.

Analysis:
1. The Applicant sought waiver of pre-deposit of CENVAT Credit amounting to Rs.52,56,935, along with penalties imposed under Section 78 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The demand primarily related to service tax on GTA service utilized for CENVAT Credit on input and input services during 2005-06 to 2007-08. A portion of the demand, around Rs.2.66 lakh, pertained to a period after 01.03.2008 when Transport of Goods Service was excluded from the definition of 'output service.' The Applicant contended that prior to this amendment, they were eligible to use CENVAT Credit for GTA service tax liability, citing a judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court. An inadvertent utilization of Credit post-amendment was rectified and reflected in their returns. The Revenue did not contest the legal position presented by the Applicant.

2. The Tribunal examined the records and acknowledged that the Applicant had indeed utilized CENVAT Credit on inputs and input services to pay service tax on GTA service from 2005-06 to 2007-08. Following the amendment in the definition of 'Output Service' effective from 01.03.2008, such Credit utilization for GTA service tax became impermissible. Referring to the precedent set by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Nahar Industrial Enterprises case, the Tribunal recognized that prior to the amendment, CENVAT Credit could be used for GTA service tax liability. Given that a significant part of the demand pertained to the period before March 2008, the Tribunal found merit in the Applicant's case for a total waiver of the adjudged dues. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a waiver on the pre-deposit of all dues and stayed the recovery during the pendency of the Appeal.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the legal arguments, precedents cited, and the Tribunal's reasoning leading to the decision to grant the waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery of dues.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates