2013 (11) TMI 406 - AT - Wealth-tax

Factory land to be covered under the definition of asset u/s 2(ea) of the Wealth tax act Held that - Scope of section 2(ea), does not include urban land but once the land so held is part of the industrial undertaking or factory it ceases to have the independent character as urban land; it is a part and parcel of the industrial undertaking, factory or business premises as the case may be. The mere fact that a part of land, which is held as factory, is sold by the assesese as a piece of land would not change the character of asset in the hands of the assessee - There may be situations in which a part of factory land may be sold as land but as long as it is a part of the factory, it cannot have any other character in the hands of the assessee than factory as such. A vacant piece of land, even if it can be sold as land as such, continues to be a business asset as long as vacant land an integral part of factory etc. - Decided against the revenue.

Summary

Issues:
Challenge to correctness of Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) order for assessment year 2004-05 regarding deletion of addition of land value in taxable wealth.

Analysis:
The Assessing Officer contested the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) order dated 17th February, 2012, for the assessment year 2004-05, specifically objecting to the deletion of the addition of land value in the taxable wealth of the assessee. The Assessing Officer argued that the Commissioner erred in law and fact by not examining the details of business activities conducted on the land in question. The assessee, a Limited Company engaged in manufacturing sanitarywares and glasswares, clarified during reassessment that the land value in question was part of the factory premises used for industrial activities. However, the Assessing Officer disregarded these explanations and added the land value to the taxable wealth, citing the sale of a portion of the land and lack of evidence proving industrial use. The Assessing Officer emphasized that selling a part of land over a factory building implies failure to pay Wealth Tax on vacant urban land.

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) disagreed with the Assessing Officer, ruling that the land was being utilized for factory and commercial purposes, making it a productive asset. Referring to the Wealth Tax Act, the Commissioner highlighted that urban land with buildings or used for business purposes is exempt from wealth tax. Consequently, the Commissioner deleted the addition of land value. Unsatisfied with this decision, the Assessing Officer appealed the matter.

Upon review, the Appellate Tribunal noted that once land forms part of an industrial undertaking or factory, it loses its independent urban land status and becomes integral to the business premises. Even if a portion of factory land is sold separately, it retains its character as part of the factory in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that vacant land, if integral to the factory, remains a business asset even if it can be sold as land separately. Since the sold land was part of the factory premises, the Tribunal upheld the relief granted by the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal affirmed that the land, being part of the factory premises and used for manufacturing and commercial activities, was not liable for wealth tax, in accordance with the provisions of the Wealth Tax Act. The Tribunal's decision was based on the understanding that the sold land, despite being a separate piece, maintained its character as an integral part of the factory, warranting the deletion of its value from the taxable wealth of the assessee.