9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (11) TMI 580 - HC - Income TaxValidity of block assessment u/s 158BC pursuant to search conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act Appellant is a firm running Bar attached Hotel and Restaurant. A search was conducted under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act at the business premises of the appellant on 12.12.1996. Thereafter, the assessment proceedings were initiated under Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1986 to 12.12.1996. The assessment was completed for the said period as per order dated 26.08.1998 fixing the undisclosed income for the assessment years 1993- 94 to 1997- 98 as Rs.1,06,62,370/- - Held that - The jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to make block assessment for the undisclosed income cannot be found fault with. The assessments were made based on the materials seized during search and seizure - Entire matter had been fairly considered on the basis of evidence on record and the Tribunal has reconsidered the entire issue and confirmed the view expressed by the Assessing Officer Decided against the Assessee.
Issues:
1. Challenge to the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding block assessment for a specific period. 2. Appellant's contentions regarding the assessment process and undisclosed income determination. 3. Questions of law raised by the appellant for consideration. 4. Assessment details and findings for specific assessment years - 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96, and 1996-97. 5. Tribunal's confirmation of assessing officer's findings and dismissal of appellant's contentions. Issue 1: Challenge to Tribunal's Order The appellant contested the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning block assessment for the period from 01.04.1986 to 12.12.1996. The Tribunal had set aside the initial block assessment order and directed a fresh assessment, leading to subsequent appeals and reassessments. Issue 2: Appellant's Contentions The appellant argued that the Tribunal did not adequately consider their grievances based on facts from the original assessment order and previous tribunal rulings. They contended that the undisclosed income quantification lacked a proper basis and was not legally sustainable under the Income Tax Act provisions. Issue 3: Questions of Law Raised The appellant raised several questions of law, questioning the Tribunal's justification for ignoring previous directions, confirming estimates without seized documents, and sustaining additions contrary to statutory provisions. They also challenged the legality and validity of the Tribunal's order. Issue 4: Assessment Details For the assessment year 1993-94, the Tribunal confirmed the assessment based on seized materials, with a declared undisclosed income of Rs.7,23,754. In 1994-95, the undisclosed income was estimated at Rs.4,00,000, considering evidence from search materials and the firm's financial activities. Similarly, for 1995-96 and 1996-97, undisclosed incomes were quantified based on discrepancies in financial statements. Issue 5: Tribunal's Confirmation Upon review, the Tribunal upheld the assessing officer's findings for various assessment years, dismissing the appellant's challenges. The court determined that the assessments were made using seized materials and existing evidence, and the Tribunal's decisions were based on factual considerations, warranting no interference from the court. In conclusion, the court dismissed the appeal, finding no grounds for challenging the Tribunal's orders, which were deemed appropriate based on the evidence and legal provisions.
|
