2013 (12) TMI 290 - AT - Customs

Refund of duty - Import of machinery - Held that - in cases involving Central PSUs where the COD had declined permission prior to 17-2-2011, when the Apex Court pronounced its judgment in the case of ECIL (2011 (2) TMI 3 - Supreme Court), either party cannot pursue the appeals. Prior to 17-2-2011, such appellants were bound to obtain clearance from the COD as per the judgments recalled by the ECIL judgment - Decided against Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
- Appeal filed by Revenue seeking to vacate order allowing refund of duty
- Committee on Disputes declining permission for Department to pursue appeal
- Instructions issued by C.B.E. & C. regarding appeals involving Central PSUs
- Compliance with Board's instructions by field officers
- Applicability of judgments recalled by ECIL case on appeals involving Central PSUs
- Dismissal of appeal by Department with consequential relief to respondents

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging an order allowing a refund of duty paid by a Central PSU on imports of machinery. The respondents, M/s. Kudremukh Iron Ore Ltd., had paid Rs. 16.53 lakhs in duty on 12 consignments of machinery during the year 1988-89. The Commissioner (Appeals) had granted the refund, prompting the Revenue to appeal the decision.

During the proceedings, the learned Consultant representing the respondents referred to the minutes of the Committee on Disputes meeting dated 13-5-2008, where permission to pursue the appeal had been declined. Additionally, a letter dated 24th March, 2011 from C.B.E. & C. was presented, containing instructions related to a judgment by the Supreme Court in the case of Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. v. Union of India and Others. The judgment had implications on appeals involving Central PSUs, specifically regarding the requirement of clearance from the Committee on Disputes.

The judgment highlighted that prior to 17-2-2011, appeals involving Central PSUs where the Committee on Disputes had declined permission required clearance from the Committee. However, post the ECIL judgment, such appellants were no longer bound by this requirement. The Board's instructions were being followed by field officers, as confirmed by the learned JCDR during the proceedings.

Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Department, citing the applicability of the ECIL judgment and the Circular issued by the C.B.E. & C. The dismissal of the appeal came with consequential relief to the respondents, upholding the decision to allow the refund of duty paid by M/s. Kudremukh Iron Ore Ltd. on the imported machinery consignments.