9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The issues involved in this case are whether the Tribunal was justified in not considering the case on merits and whether the Tribunal was right in law and fact in holding that the question of restoration of the addition made to the gross profit does not arise at present.
Summary: The High Court of Kerala addressed the reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal concerning an assessee's income tax assessment for the year 1975-76. The Income-tax Officer had initially added Rs. 90,000 to the income returned by the assessee, which was later deleted by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Subsequently, the Income-tax Officer initiated proceedings under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act for the same year. A revised assessment order was passed on October 31, 1980, closing the reassessment proceedings as "N. A." The Tribunal, considering the revised order, concluded that the original assessment had been annulled, and therefore, there was no need to restore or delete the earlier addition to the gross profit. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, leading to the current reference before the High Court. The High Court emphasized that the revised order closing the reassessment proceedings as "N. A." was a final and lawful termination of the assessment proceedings, as established by legal precedents. The Court noted that the effect of reopening the assessment was to nullify the initial assessment order and substitute it with the revised order, rendering the original assessment non-existent. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision not to consider the appeal on merits was deemed justified, and the Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both questions referred. The Court rejected the Revenue's argument that the revised order was illegal, stating that any defects should have been addressed through revision proceedings initiated by the Commissioner of Income-tax. The Court emphasized that the Revenue could not challenge the legality of the revised order at that stage. Additionally, the Court declined to issue directions to rectify the revised order, stating that it was not within their jurisdiction to do so. The Court also mentioned the Revenue's ability to bring the admitted income to tax in accordance with the law. In conclusion, the High Court provided a detailed analysis of the legal principles governing the case and upheld the Tribunal's decision, answering the referred questions against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee. The Court directed that a copy of the judgment be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Cochin Bench for further action.
|
