1996 (12) TMI 100 - AT - Income Tax

Assessing Officer, Assessment Notice, Assessment Year, Income From Business, Original Assessment, Reassessment Notice, Regular Assessment

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reopening the original assessment under section 147.
2. Addition of Rs. 2,00,000 as unexplained cash payment.
3. Addition of Rs. 25,000 as income from undisclosed business in sanitary goods.
4. Addition of Rs. 70,000 on account of unexplained gifts.
5. Charging of interest under sections 139(8) and 217 of the Act.
6. Ex parte assessment order.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reopening the Original Assessment under Section 147:

The assessee contended that the reopening of the original assessment was invalid as there was no omission or failure on their part to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ITO under section 147, stating that the reopening was based on new information found in seized documents and large credits in bank passbooks. The Tribunal held that the reassessment does not render the original assessment void and that the CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal as infructuous. The original assessment was reopened only as regards income escaping assessment, and the reassessment proceedings are confined to the matters relevant to the escaped income.

2. Addition of Rs. 2,00,000 as Unexplained Cash Payment:

The ITO added Rs. 2,00,000 as unexplained cash paid to Sri I.M. Dhawan, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee argued that this amount was paid by his wife and assessed in her case. The Tribunal found that the ITO had considered this amount as concealed income in the order under section 132(5) but did not bring it to tax in the regular assessment, which amounts to a change of opinion. The Tribunal held that the ITO could not reopen the assessment on this ground and deleted the addition of Rs. 2,00,000.

3. Addition of Rs. 25,000 as Income from Undisclosed Business in Sanitary Goods:

The ITO added Rs. 25,000 as income from undisclosed business in sanitary goods based on seized documents marked BM-5. The CIT(A) set aside the assessment on this point for further investigation. The Tribunal found that the assessee admitted to some business activities in sanitary goods in his statement under section 132(4) and upheld the addition of Rs. 25,000 as the assessee failed to provide evidence to the contrary.

4. Addition of Rs. 70,000 on Account of Unexplained Gifts:

The ITO added Rs. 70,000 as unexplained gifts received by the assessee's minor sons. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as infructuous, and the Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to decide the appeal afresh. This issue was pending in the original appeal and was not separately disputed before the CIT(A).

5. Charging of Interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 of the Act:

The assessee argued that no interest is chargeable under section 217 as the assessment is not a regular assessment. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer accordingly, stating that the interest under section 139(8) is consequential in nature.

6. Ex Parte Assessment Order:

The assessee contended that the ex parte assessment order was not justified. The Tribunal found that sufficient reasons were given by the authorities below for passing the ex parte order and confirmed the same.

Conclusion:
- ITA No. 551/Cal./90 was allowed for statistical purposes.
- ITA No. 552/Cal./90 and ITA No. 3912/Cal./92 were partly allowed.