Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (5) TMI 194 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of provisions regarding carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation.
2. Application of section 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001.
3. Determining the time limit for carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation.
4. Applicability of Circular No.14 of 2001 in clarifying the intent of the amendment.

Analysis:
1. The High Court was presented with a Tax Appeal challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the allowance of the claim for carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation. The specific question under consideration was whether the ITAT was correct in allowing the claim for carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation for more than eight years, contrary to the provisions of section 32(2)(iii)(b) as it stood in the relevant assessment years.
2. The Court referred to a previous judgment in the case of General Motors India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT, where the issue of carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation was extensively discussed. The Court examined the provisions of section 32(2) before and after its amendment by the Finance Act, 2001. The amendment removed the restriction of eight years for carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation, enabling the allowance to be carried forward without any time limit from assessment year 2002-03 onwards.
3. The Court highlighted that the amendment aimed to enable industries to conserve funds for replacing plant and machinery, emphasizing that any unabsorbed depreciation available before the amendment could be carried forward and set off against profits and gains of subsequent years without any time limit. The Circular No.14 of 2001 clarified the intent behind the amendment, ensuring that unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years could be utilized without restrictions.
4. Ultimately, the Court found that the Tribunal correctly applied the law based on the decision in the General Motors case, where it was held that unabsorbed depreciation from previous assessment years could be set off in subsequent years without any time limit. As no question of law arose in the present appeal, it was dismissed accordingly.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the interpretation of provisions related to the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation, emphasizing the impact of the Finance Act, 2001 amendment and the applicability of Circular No.14 of 2001 in removing the time limit for such carry forwards.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates