Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2014 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (6) TMI 410 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Challenge against disallowance of pay channel charges under sec. 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct tax at source.

Analysis:
The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs.163.30 lakhs for pay channel charges under sec. 40(a)(ia) due to failure in TDS deduction. The Assessing officer considered the payments as "royalty" under sec. 194J, requiring TDS. The assessee relied on Skycell Communications Ltd. case, but Assessing officer disagreed. The Assessing officer argued that the payments were for broadcasting services, falling under royalty. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, leading to the current appeal.

The Tribunal examined the definition of "royalty" under Explanation 2 to sec. 9(1). The Finance Act, 2012 added Explanation 6, clarifying "process" to include satellite transmission. As the assessee transmitted TV signals via satellite, it fell under the definition of "royalty". The Ld. Counsel argued against retrospective application of the amendment, citing the Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. case. The Tribunal reviewed related case laws and held that the subsequent amendments did not impose TDS liability.

The Tribunal found support for the assessee's position in the Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. case, concluding that pay channel charges were not subject to TDS as royalty. Despite alternative contentions by the assessee, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing deletion of the disallowance. The decision was pronounced on 06-06-2014.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates