2014 (7) TMI 255 - AT - Income Tax

Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) Payment to overseas institution as fees for awarding the degrees, supplying books and course material TDS not deducted u/s 195 - technical know-how or technical services - Held that - CIT(A) rightly of the view that the amount has been paid by the assessee to the overseas institutions as fees for awarding the degrees, supplying books and course material - fees is paid towards the study curriculum which includes teachers textbooks, teaching aids, associated marketing tools and materials etc. - There is no transfer of any technical know-how or technical services - The Revenue has not been able to substantiate its plea, as to how the amount paid falls in the category of technical fee thus, there was no infirmity in the order Decided against Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Appeal against Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) order for Assessment Year 2008-09.
2. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of tax at source.
3. Nature of payment made to overseas institutions.
4. Interpretation of Co-operation Agreement between the parties.
5. Dispute on whether payment constitutes technical fees.

Analysis:

1. The appeal filed by the Revenue was against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) for the Assessment Year 2008-09.

2. The dispute primarily revolved around the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of tax at source on the payment made by the assessee to overseas institutions.

3. The assessee, a company engaged in education, paid an amount to international institutions for examination fees, study material, and books without deducting tax at source. The Revenue contended that the payment constituted technical fees, leading to the disallowance under section 40(a)(i).

4. The Co-operation Agreement between the assessee and the overseas institution was examined to determine the nature of the payment. Articles 2 and 3 of the agreement were crucial in understanding the responsibilities and fee structure involved in the collaboration.

5. The Tribunal analyzed the agreement and concluded that the payment made was towards study curriculum, including teaching materials, and not for technical services. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the Revenue's claim that the payment fell under the category of technical fees. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed for lacking merit.